This is it! Time to vote — what is your gut feeling?
Please first answer YES or NO — Should we rescue individuals who take risks?
Then, give me one concise sentence — what is the main point in your argument that has you swinging that direction?
- Comment
- Reblog
-
Subscribe
Subscribed
Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
skidzone 
Yes people should. Having that be your job is a risk that you have to take. That is what you have to take be in the rescue system.
Yes, we should rescue people who take risks because they could be taking risks for us so you should rescue individuals who take risks.
yes because its what you signed up for, to save peoples life’s so even tho they went up in the first place they still need to get rescue by someone.
I think you should rescue people because you have chosen he job.Every life is important.
I say yes because everyone is important to the world. What if it was you on the mountain and you wanted to be saved. Then nobody came for you and you are just stuck their on the mountain until you fall to your death or find way to save yourself from the danger of the fall (not trying to scare you and no a fence).
Yes they should because their the ones who wanted that job and if the get hurt or died at least it happened for a worthy cause.
Yes, because if you have that job you need to be prepared to be in danger from time to time. That is just part of working in a rescue system.
No they should not. They knew the risk(the climbers) and they climbed the mountain anyway. They should not have to risk more lives just beacause some inexperianced climbers messed up.
Yes i think people should have have rights because they know what they are getting their self into but they also can’t handle if they fall they can’t control them falling .
yes,people who take risks should be able to be rescued if there is an emergency and they aren’t rescued, the people who’s job to help people in that situation wouldnt be doing that job right
Yes i think people should have rights because they know what they are getting their self into but they also can’t handle if they fall they can’t control it
No, Because unless given proper training to climb mountains the climbers are putting themselves at risk and they can be putting others at risk.
No, people shouldn’t rescue individuals who take risks, because they know what they are doing as they are mountain climbing, and they can put other people at risk while those people are trying to save them from dying.
No, people choose to climb and if they don’t want to do it anymore they need to figure out how to be safe again, or when two people are together and they both need rescued well only one person will be saved I feel that its not fare to the other climber that was with them.
Yes, I think there should be helicopter rescues for mountain climbing on Everest. There are tons of risks of falling into a deep crevice, and over 200 people have died on Everest climbing it. (from Close Reader article) This concludes my comment
No, I don’t think that the people should have a right to get recued .The climbers should know that they could get hurt or even die so if they want to take that risk they can. Rescuers shouldn’t have to risk their lives to save the people that know that they could get into trouble.
Abby Rambler #215
Yes, people should have the right to be rescued. If you’re in a dangerous situation wouldn’t you want to be rescued? Also, if you are the rescuer, you signed up for this job being aware that you may be in danger.
Peyton Oliver #816
yes, people should be able to be saved because they knew the risks of mountain climbing but they probably didn’t know how bad the risks were.
Yes, people should always be saved. If you where up on a mountain about to die you would want someone to save you. Life is very precious and we should all help each other out whenever possible, human life is not a game we are playing.
I say yes rescue just because people do some pretty dumb things sometimes doesn’t mean we should let them die, I mean yeah sure its their fault that they got into that very situation but that doesn’t mean they deserve to die.
Yes because if it is possible that we can save the claimers we should. also the people that have the job know that they could die and know one has to do it. I think the people that save the claimers would not say no that’s there problem for claiming the mountain.
No,the people who have no training know that they should not because of many risk yet they ignore it and put not only their life but others life at risk.
At first I did think that no they should not send rescue services, but now that I look I think that yes because even if your risking your life for another, you still signed up for the job and you would know what you were getting into and what could happen.
I think we should save the people because so many people lose there lives everdaay and with a little more money we could save more lives and feel better that you helped someone today. So yes I do think we should send rescue devices.
I don’t think anyone should be open to rescue services because there the ones who put themselves at risk. The rescuers would also put themselves at risk saving you and would probably fall to there death. The rescue services are also not responsible for you climbing the mountain. That’s why no one should be open to recuse services.
No, I do not think that a rescue people should risk there life to save someone because why lose two life’s for one and then that person needs help and they will keep sending peolpe up to help them. The main idea of my answer is that no i dont belive that people should risk there life’s for people who risk there owen
My answer is yes, recommend they are saved, and no, they shouldn’t be saved. I say no because the climber new that they would be in danger and they took that risk. The rescuers may die as well as the climber and the helper. More lives are lost as we try to rescue them. I also say yes, because it is the rescuers choice whether or not he wants to put his live and the climbers live in more danger. And it is his decision if he wants to save them. I am a yes, but also, a no.
Yes, I think that everyone should have a right to rescue services because even if you put your self at risk you should be able to survive if possible. If someone can save you then you shouldn’t just be left to die for no reason.
Yes, they should be saved if they call for help or if the helicopter operators want to fly out and rescue them.
no they should not be saved by rescue services because, These people who are saving the people are dying when they save them. Its just sad when people die saving someone else. It s just risking there lives.
alison pantea not arts0917
Ayiana Andrella
802
I think yes, we should be able to rescue the people who take the risk but I think we should have rules. Such as after a certain high mark we shouldn’t be expected to help the people.
My answer is no, because these climbers should know what they are getting into and need to prepare ahead of time in case of an emergency privaly instead of getting a public service to help them.
yes because to me all life is special and it is there choise to do so
yes you should save people because it is what you signed up for is to save peoples lives.
i think we should rescue the climbers because no one deserves to die from one risk if they can be saved then we should try every human life matters just the same and the people in the helicopter knew there job and the risks
i think we should rescue the climbers because everyone deserves a chance to live
Of COURSE!!!!! If they come to take the risk we should rescue them! no matter how absolutely STUPID said individual did!